Credit – Vaers
In an article from Toby Rogers over at his Substack, he points out ten red flags in Pfizers application for an EUA for kids ages 5-11. An FDA panel, on Tuesday, recommended a low dose Pfizer vaccine for kids ages 5-11. The 18 member panel was almost unanimous with 17 members voting for the recommendation with one abstention. The FDA’s risk benefit analysis of Pfizer’s application, is so filled with holes, it just adds more doubt and speculation of the government run entity. If the FDA approves the Pfizer vaccination, and CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky signs off, dosing that age group could begin immediately, as the Biden administration has already acquired the needed doses for the 28 million in that age group. The United States government, is the government of snake oil salesmen trying to push their potion of lies on an unwilling audience.
Zero Cases of Severe Covid-19 and Zero Cases of Death
The first flag and probably the most important one, according to Rogers, comes from the fact that there were zero percent of severe Covid-19 cases and zero deaths in the trials. This should automatically refute any need for an emergency use authorization.
“COVID-19 rates in children ages 5 to 11 are so low that there were ZERO cases of severe COVID-19 and ZERO cases of death from COVID in either the treatment (n= 1,518) or control group (n= 750). So any claims you see in the press about the Pfizer vaccine being “90% effective” in children are meaningless because they are referring to mild cases from which children usually recover quickly (and then have robust broad spectrum immunity). So there is literally no emergency in this population for which one could apply for Emergency Use Authorization. Pfizer’s application should be dead on arrival if the FDA actually followed the science and their own rules.”
People Who Have Recovered From Covid Have a Much better Defense Against Covid
In red flag number two, Rogers states that the size of the trial was intentionally small for the sole purpose of hiding any harmful side effects. If you have a group of only 1518 participants, the chances that the adverse effects being noticed is extremely minimal. Adverse effects to the Pfizer vaccine are 1 in 5000. With a test group as small as 1518, the adverse effects would be negligible. In the third red flag, Rogers points out that the Pfizer study excluded anyone in the 5-11 age group that had previously been infected with Covid-19. This is alarming since we now know that infected individuals who have recovered from Covid, have a much better defense against the virus than those who have been vaccinated. Meaning, that if you were infected with Covid, and then got the vaccine, your bodies chance of defending itself against mutations such as the Delta variant are extremely diminished. From Alex Berenson’s analysis over at his SubStack:
“What the British are saying is they are now finding the vaccine interferes with your body’s innate ability after infection to produce antibodies against not just the spike protein but other pieces of the virus. Specifically, vaccinated people don’t seem to be producing antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein, the shell of the virus, which are a crucial part of the response in unvaccinated people. This means vaccinated people will be far more vulnerable to mutations in the spike protein EVEN AFTER THEY HAVE BEEN INFECTED AND RECOVERED ONCE (or more than once, probably). It also means the virus is likely to select for mutations that go in exactly that direction because those will essentially give it an enormous vulnerable population to infect. And it probably is still more evidence the vaccines may interfere with the development of robust long-term immunity post-infection.”
The Study in This Age Group Was Not Long Enough
In red flag number four, Pfizer lost contact with almost 5% of their clinical trial participants. Rogers points out that, with a trial so small in size of 1518 participants, almost 5% is a huge number not to consider. Rogers supports that with red flag number five, in which he states the length of the study was too short to account for long term side effects let alone short term side effects. One group in the study was only followed for two months, while the second group was only monitored for 17 days for adverse side effects. That’s crazy. Which leads to red flag number six.
Myocarditis is Not the Only Side Effect
The FDA risk benefit analysis only looked at one side effect…Myocarditis. There have been more than one adverse reactions to this vaccine and the FDA ignored them.
“The risk-benefit model created by the FDA only looks at one known harm from the Pfizer mRNA shot — myocarditis. But we know that the real world harms from the Pfizer mRNA shot go well beyond myocarditis and include anaphylaxis, Bell’s Palsy, heart attack, thrombocytopenia/ low platelet, permanent disability, shingles, and Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) to name a few. Cancer, diabetes, endocrine disruption, and autoimmune disorders may show up later. But the FDA does not care about any of that because they have a vaccine to sell so they just ignore all of those factors in their model.”
In red flag number seven, Pfizer wiped out its control group that received a placebo by injecting them with the Pfizer vaccine. Unbelievable.
“They claim that they are doing this for “ethical reasons”. But everyone knows that Pfizer’s true aim is to wipe out any comparison group so that there can be no long term safety studies. Wiping out the control group is a criminal act and yet Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, and AZ do this as standard practice with the blessing of the FDA/CDC.”
According to Rogers, red flag number eight is the big one. Basically what Pfizer and the FDA did was use antibody studies from people ages 16-25 to prove effectiveness of the vaccine because they couldn’t get any results from the 5-11 age group…because there were ZERO serious cases of Covid.
“There were ZERO cases of severe COVID-19 in the clinical trial of children ages 5 to 11. So Pfizer and the FDA just ignored all of the actual health outcomes (they had to, there is no emergency, so the application is moot). INSTEAD Pfizer switched to looking at antibodies in the blood. In general, antibodies are a poor predictor of immunity. And the antibodies in the blood of these 5 to 11 year old children tell us nothing because again, there were zero cases of severe COVID-19 in this study (none in the treatment group, none in the control group). So Pfizer had to get creative! What they came up with is “immuno-bridging”. Pfizer looked at the level of antibodies in the bloodwork of another study, this one involving people 16 to 25 years old, figured out the level of antibodies that seems to be protective in thatpopulation, then figured out how many kids ages 5 to 11 had similar levels of antibodies in their blood, and then came up with a number for how many cases, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, and deaths would be prevented by this shot in the 5 to 11 population in the future, based on the antibody levels and health outcomes from the 16 to 25 year old population. If your head hurts from that tortured logic, it should, because such chicanery is unprecedented in a risk-benefit analysis.”
Children’s Natural Immunity is Better Than Having Them be Vaccinated
Red flags nine and ten deal with the fact that young healthy children should not be vaccinated, period, as they are better fitted to producing antibodies that will give them a natural immunity to the virus. Whats even more troubling is the fact that if kids are vaccinated, and have had Covid, their ability to fight the virus and produce antibodies diminishes, not to mention they become shedders of more virulent forms of the Covid virus. Rogers backs this up from an article by Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche:
“Under no circumstances should young and healthy people be vaccinated as it will only erode their protective innate immunity towards Coronaviruses (CoV) and other respiratory viruses. Their innate immunity normally/ naturally largely protects them and provides a kind of herd immunity in that it dilutes infectious CoV pressure at the level of the population, whereas mass vaccination turns them into shedders of more infectious variants. Children/ youngsters who get the disease mostly develop mild to moderate disease and as a result continue to contribute to herd immunity by developing broad and long-lived immunity. If you are vaccinated and get the disease, you may develop life-long immunity too but why would you take the risk of getting vaccinated, especially when you’re young and healthy? Firstly, there is the risk of potential side effects; secondarily, there is the ever increasing risk that your vaccinal antibodies will no longer be functional while still binding to the virus, thereby increasing the likelihood of ADE or even severe disease….”
17,000 Deaths From the Covid Vaccine and 818,000 Adverse Reactions
In addition to that, Rogers states that kids who develop Myocarditis have a 20% fatality after 2 years and a 50% fatality rate after 5 years. Not to mention what the long term effects of the vaccine are after having taken it for years. As of right now, there are over 17,000 deaths from the covid vaccine alone and the number keeps climbing. That’s almost double any deaths, from all other vaccines combined, since 1990. That doesn’t sound safe to me. There are also over 818,000 reported adverse effects from the vaccine. Why are the CDC, the FDA, and the Biden administration pushing so hard for this? That’s a rhetorical question…we all know why…the green and control.
Viral myocarditis results in 2 in 10 people dead after 2 years and 5 in 10 after 5 years. It’s not mild. It’s dead heart muscle. https://t.co/ixRmk48rja
— Dr Anthony Hinton (@TonyHinton2016) October 20, 2021
The Government is Peddling Snake Oil
Any vaccine, including the Pfizer Bio N Tech vaccine, should be tested for longer than 6 months to ensure its safety and effectiveness. Joe Biden and Kamala Harris were on record many times last year stating they refused to take this vaccine, but now it’s ok…why? Many, many reasons, but the main one is control and fear. The public is not buying it anymore. We’re not anti vaccine, we’re just anti forcing us to have a medical procedure against our wills. We’re also not stupid. The Covid vaccine is proving more and more, every day, ineffective against this virus as we see infections rise from the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated. Just take a look at Warterford, Ireland where 99.7% of the population was vaccinated and now their Covid infection rate is 3 times the national average. Where’s the FDA’s and CDC’s science on that?
